|
Give it a
rest Bill
Guest
 |
Post by Guest on Mar 12, 2014 at 9:23pm
Looks like Bill has lost the
plot big bold words only shows his frustration that he cannot
prove he has the right place. Questions have been put to him by
Brian and Glenn has told him where he can by a copy of their
report. Looks like he is about to take his bat and ball and run
home to mummy again. Bill a little tip no one wants to believe
anything that a arrogant poster such as yourself has to say
whether you are right or wrong you are your own worst enemy
debate the subject and stop being so arrogant with your posts
towards others. Maybe then people will start believing you may
have something to offer until then you will continue to bang
your head against the might SBC wall.
|
| |
|
|
Locoweed
Guest |
Post by Guest on Mar 12, 2014 at 9:41pm
More preaching.
No CSI SBC site.
Y A W N
|
| |
|
|
Dee
Administrator
|
Post by Dee on Mar 12, 2014 at 10:31pm
In defence of Bill I would
say he has put up a lot of material that supports his case. I
would be surprised if there was complete agreement between all
the various recollections and descriptions of exactly what lay
where and at what distance and so on, so I am not put off by the
fact that not everything fits neatly together . Picking holes in
Bills theory doesn't prove the CSI case, so isn't it time we
heard some more from CSI about their exact site and how their
measurements and so on are a better explanation of the evidence
than Bills?
Please don't just attack each other. |
| |
|
|
Horrie
Guest
|
Post by Guest on Mar 12, 2014 at 10:32pm
Brian, you wrote "A few
weeks back I photocopied the csi's report [from slv]". You
wouldn't have been allowed to photocopy it.
The CSI team have been photographed many times at SBC, but there
are no such photos of others (such as yourself) and we are asked
to believe what you say with no evidence:
* You know what you are talking about
* You have ever been to the SBC sites under discussion here
* You comprehend what is being explained
You are at pains to say how fair you want to be in your private
researching. You don't say where that 'research' is leading. Do
you intend to publish it, so we can critique your findings? Talk
is cheap. I don't know who you are and whether you possess any
research skills. You said of me that I was "Horrie aka Mrs
Denheld". That was a bit rude and foolish, Brian.
So far, all you have done is criticise Bill while pretending to
be impartial. |
| |
|
|
Brian
Guest
|
Post by Guest on Mar 13, 2014 at 9:17am
Horrie, horrie, horrie, your such a horrid
Brian, you wrote "A few weeks back I photocopied the csi's
report [from slv]". You wouldn't have been allowed to photocopy
it. LMFAO. FYI I copied the
report under their noses NO questions asked.
The CSI team have been photographed many times at SBC, but there
are no such photos of others (such as yourself) and we are asked
to believe what you say with no evidence:
LOL If thats how you feel bugger
off dude. I don't see how a photo of me would change
anything.
* You know what you are talking about
I certainly do. Do you?
* You have ever been to the SBC sites under discussion here
Dude chill out and take a happy
pill. F@#*d up questions deserves a kick in the butt. Grow up
or shut up.
* You comprehend what is being explained
I find it very unlikely you do. Go
back and try
You are at pains to say how fair you want to be in your private
researching. You don't say where that 'research' is leading.
Re-read my previous post
Do you intend to publish it, FYI
I will make it pubic at some stage.
Talk is cheap. Your seem to do a
lot of it dude
I don't know who you are Lets
keep it that way, it's safer if you don't know who I am
and whether you possess any research skills.
You can rest assured I'm doing
well. No need for you to
express any concerns from hereon please mind your own F@@@@
business
You said of me that I was "Horrie aka Mrs Denheld". That was a
bit rude and foolish, Brian. Was
it? show us readers a
recent photo of you! or is it too close to home. A suggestion,
google one.
......................................................................................................
Bill,
I will ask you the question once more at: stringybarkcreek.forumotion.com/ Also
Glen, I'll like to ask the team a number of Q.s. Hope we can all
have a a good clean debate without idiots interfering. |
| |
|
|
bill
Junior Member
|
Post by bill on Mar 13, 2014 at 12:03pm
Brian wrote- 12 Feb, 9:23 am
Very well Mr. Denheld
Now explain to the readers (In simple terminology) where exactly
YOUR spring can to be found? Does it flow all year round? I'm
intrigued.
My answer -
Yes Brian, The Spring flows past the two huts site all year
round, while a few hundred metres up the gully* you will find no
running water at all. *(beyond the discharge point) Bill
Brian then writes-
"Mr. Denheld,
Understood, or so it appears I do.
Is this the same body of water that flows to the east of the hut
sites? more commonly known as "stringy bark crk"
Yes Brian, same
body of water I already gave you the answer before-
"The Spring flows past the
two huts site all year round, while a few hundred metres up the
gully* you will find no running water at all." *(beyond the
discharge point)
The SBC
spring / creek runs from South to North.
Bill |
| |
|
|
Dee
Administrator
|
Post by Dee on Mar 13, 2014 at 12:48pm
Brian that last post of yours was decidedly
un-parliamentary and I want you to avoid making any more like
that in the future. As I say I don't want to delete Posts but I
am still hoping it will be rare that I need to do so. Like you I
Hope we can all have a good clean debate without idiots
interfering. And Horrie - please settle down. |
| |
|
|
Horrie
Guest
|
Post by Guest on Mar 13, 2014 at 2:00pm
I dislike being bullied and
threatened, Brian.
I have crossed you off my Christmas Card list! |
| |
|
|
Ron
Guest
|
Post by Guest on Mar 13, 2014 at 2:14pm
Horrie you are off everyone's Christmas list!
Brian has made some interesting contributions to this topic and
asked sensible questions. That is a lot more than you have done.
You refused to prove you have ever been to SBC, let alone the
rock piles and now you question Brian. There are two sets of
rules here, one for you (and your other egos) and Bill and
another for everyone else.
|
| |
|
|
Veritas
Guest
|
Post by Guest on Mar 13, 2014 at 5:03pm
It is
interesting when time is taken to flick backwards through a
jumble of postings, and try to understand some of the posts and
what they are saying.
I see Kelvyn has continually had to tell Mr Denheld about his
very poor attempts to associate some of the names used here with
what he refers to as pseudoes and I now get a funny feeling that
Horrie (seems more appropriate to say Horrible) may indeed be a
pseudo for the Denheld crowd or the leader himself. Horrie
points out a pipe exists, Kelvyn says he and others could not
find a pipe but then of course Mr Denheld launches into another
rant about the pipe and how he will get a photograph for Kelvyn.
Why couldn't a grown man like Horrie reply?
Mr Denheld also says the CSI pipe - does this mean that the pipe
is where the CSI team have said there is a spring? I see that
Kelvyn has explained how the road now has a water runoff
diversion drain to send water from the spring's outflow across
the road and run it off towards the Creek. This is without doubt
the work of road maintenance people to ensure the road does not
get rutted by water flowing over it (this water would be coming
off the downward slope and if allowed to continue along the road
make the road looking North pretty uncomfortable for drivers and
of course mean road maintenance would become a problem for the
shire council or whoever maintains the road.
I must also say that a spring is clearly near the CSI teams site
and its a real spring; not this stupid concept that Stringybark
Creek is a spring just because it disappears below ground at
some point. Its as sure as hell, that the creek flows along its
course from up at the Old Tolmie Road (which can become almost
impassable at times due to water crossing it at the head of the
creek, the water coming from the property on the other side of
the old road. Its stupid to say that just because a Creeks water
goes underground for part of the way that when the water comes
back to ground level that this is a spring. An underground river
or creek is just that and not a spring.
I read somewhere that Ned sent his brother to the spring to
watch for the policemen . Jeez you wouldn't go to the lower
ground to keep a watch, so the spring on the high side of
Stringybark Creek Road fits perfectly. |
| |
|
|
bill
Junior Member
|
Post by bill on Mar 13, 2014 at 7:11pm
Good on you Kel.
It's all so amazing these non identities pumping
away with great authority.
Carla and I are the only ones on this forum prepared to show we
are real.
What are all these pseudos afraid of ?
SBC - Crime Scene Investigators, put your 'Stuff Up' |
| |
|
|
Dee
Administrator
|
Post by Dee on Mar 13, 2014 at 7:27pm
Karma kept saying I should
be ashamed of myself Bill, and occasionally I do feel a little
ashamed that I am not as fearless as you two. I feel I shouldn't
be a "non entity" but then - well frankly some of the Kelly
sympathisers are a bit scary.
Bill, would you call yourself a sympathiser? |
| |
|
|
Horrie
Guest
|
Post by Guest on Mar 13, 2014 at 8:51pm
I admire the Denhelds and
the CSI guys for using their names too. On the other hand, there
are traps for the unwary. A couple of the posters on a Forum I
can't mention are identifiable by their workplaces. They are not
abrasive in their posts, and are not vulnerable. But there are
people like Bill who have been physically threatened and
manhandled. Author Ian MacFarlane has been stalked and abused,
and his family attacked. I'm interested in the location of the
police camp, and other riddles in the Kelly story, but don't
care enough to subject myself or my family to personal abuse, or
threatening emails or 'phone calls. My real nickname is Horrie,
but I am not well-known in the Kelly discussion and don't expect
to get 'outed' just yet.
A word of warning though, Dee. Don't give out your email. Let's
just say that some females have received unwanted emails, and
leave it at that... |
| |
|
|
Horrie
Guest
|
Post by Guest on Mar 14, 2014 at 1:32pm
The silence of the hams.
I do hope the CSI boys are beavering away
at a presentation for their site, and not just nodding off in
their armchairs! |
| |
|
|
Glenn
Guest
|
Post by Guest on Mar 14, 2014 at 1:40pm
Why Horrie you can
read it all on Bill's site. As he said:
Quote: "The CSI
@sbc report - for what I show is 90% of their final and if I
show the rest it is even more ridiculous than the issue I show
which is bad enough."
But then also said:
Quote: "If we all continue to
tell lies, what do we learn from history?"
|
| |
|
|
Kelvyn
Guest
|
Post by Guest on Mar 14, 2014 at 4:03pm
Here you go again Bill.
"Good on you Kel.
It's all so amazing these non identities pumping away with great
authority.
Carla and I are the only ones on this forum prepared to show we
are real.
What are all these pseudos afraid of ? "
I certainly appreciate a positive word but again for the wrong
reason I suspect.
But here you go again; you claim you and the missus are the only
two real people.
You know Bill, again you sprout CRAP; get REAL. Why do you
persist with such immature stuff; do you simply want to fill the
pages of this forum with imbecilic unfounded mindless comment?.
No wonder the many people who remain anonymous (just as Horrie
has pointed out)stay anonymous.
And Horrie, its a pity you seem unable to phrase questions in a
civil manner.
The CSI team has presented their report to all the relevant
authorities (a list was done recently on another forum by
Poorflower) so I won't bother listing them again here.
Your two-bobs-worth adds nothing to the story. Please take a
chill-out-pill and relax; you seem to be stressing out over our
report which I have said can be obtained from the Library(s) or
from the Glenrowan Cobb & Co shop(or can't you be bothered
getting it?). I see Glenn has told you to get Denheld's stuff.
|
| |
|
|
Horrie
Guest
|
Post by Guest on Mar 14, 2014 at 9:00pm
Kel, you said the other day
"NO CSI TEAM MEMBER HAS ANY CONNECTION
WITH POORFLOWER !!!!!!!!! "
How come your post today connects Pooflower's list (on another
site) of "all the relevant authorities" that were presented with
your report.
No connection? Hmnn.
...and why can't you post a summary of your report's finding
here as has been begged for - for days!.
|
| |
|
|
Glenn
Guest |
Post by Guest on Mar 14, 2014 at 9:28pm
Horrie,
...and why can't you post a
summary of your report's finding here as has been begged for -
for days!.
Please refer to my previous post.
|
| |
|
|
Glenn
Guest
|
Post by Guest on Mar 14, 2014 at 10:22pm
Horrie,
If you are truly interested in how the CSI team have formed
their conclusions please go to the SBC forum. link
Where people who participate have real names and identities.
Hold meaningful discussions in a more structured and monitored
manner.
Which is currently in process on the SBC forum
Cheers |
| |
|
|
Horrie
Guest
|
Post by Guest on Mar 14, 2014 at 11:29pm
Glenn,
Your previous post (if you have a look) does not refer to the
summary I asked for.
I don't want to see how the CSI team formed their findings. This
thread is bursting with 'information' like that.
I just want a summary of your findings.
(I can't even go |
|
| |
|
